Mike's solution is the only sure fire way of handling this (although it requires Std Costing to realy work). To keep it simple, make you 'kit part purchase purchase direct (non stock), process the PO receipt as inspection required as needed & have PO-linked jobs with a single 'stock transform' OP that is flagged for auto-receipt as last OP. (The job would be a multi part job of course to put the individual parts in stock rather than the kit).
Â
It's a pain as you'd have to preschedule (quasi master schedule using real jobs) - but the auto receipt takes the sting out of it in another business function.
From: Mike Tonoyan <
mtonoyan@...>
To:
vantage@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, July 4, 2011 12:10 PM
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: Purchase one part, but inventory under several part numbers
Â
In our case, after receiving the parts we create a job, issue the
received parts as material, then receive the RH or LH parts into stock.
Mike Tonoyan / Natel Engr.
mtonoyan@...
From:
vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of cooner_55421
Sent: Monday, July 04, 2011 8:59 AM
To:
vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Purchase one part, but inventory under several
part numbers
Any chance the vendor will split this up into two parts for you?
If not, just wondering if you can give us a few more details.
>a single part "A"
Do you have to disassemble part "A" or instead the two components "AB" &
"AC" are already separated when you receive them?
>Part "AB" and part "AC
I'm assuming AB and AC are physically different?
--- In
vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
"sbraudrick@..." <sbraudrick@...> wrote:
>
> We would like to be able to do this as well, let me know if you find
anything.
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
"Rufus" <dshoff72@> wrote:
> >
> > I know I am asking the impossible, but has anyone dealt with or
would be willing to relate how they have setup the BOM, MOM, etc. when
we purchase a single part "A", but once we receive it, we would like to
inventory it as 2 different part numbers, part "AB" and part "AC". In
other words, one purchased unit makes a lefthand and righthand part and
we want to inventory it has a LH and RH since one subassembly BOM where
they are used takes the LH and another requires the RH.
> >
> > Since the LH and RH subassembly operations aren't produced together
it is inefficent to say that each LH/RH takes .5000 of part "A".
> >
> > I am struggling with how any costs or MRP requirements would flow
thru.
> >
> > This is somewhat the reverse of kitting.
> >
> > We are on 803.409C.
> >
>
__________________________________________________________
Notice: This email transmission may contain confidential information and is intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, copying or disclosure to/by any other person(s) is strictly prohibited. By accepting this information, recipients confirm that they understand and will comply with all applicable ITAR and EAR requirements.
__________________________________________________________
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]