Quote Module

I can put you in touch with our senior quote person. We are on version 4.0.

Warren R. Eddy
Information Services Manager
National Tube Form
A Leggett & Platt Company
Phone: (219) 478-2363 ext 217
Fax: (219) 478-1043
Warren.Eddy@...

-----Original Message-----
From: lptingley [mailto:ltingley@...]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 8:30 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Quote Module

Is there anybody, in the group, that would fall under the
classification of "Custom Job Shop", that is using the stock
Vantage Quote Module. In particular, I'm looking to talk to someone
who uses it in it's generic form without modification. 5.0 or 5.1

Thanks,
Les


Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/links

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
To all,
I created a quote in Vantage 4.0.904, pulled in the MFG Details, and
looked at the worksheet. The worksheet cost didn't agree with our
average cost. A call to Epicor revealed that Vantage is using the
routing times to develop costs. I expected Vantage to use the actual
costs. Does anyone else feel this way? The same thing would apply to
the costed BOM report which doesn't use real costs either.

Perhaps there is a discipline for updating routings that we aren't
aware of. What are you guys doing to:
1. Update routings?
2. Develop cost worksheets via the quote module?

Thanks in advance!!

Andrew
Andrew,

My understanding of the quoting module is that it uses "Quoted Cost" x
"Quoted Hrs". As opposed to using the "Costing Rates".

"Quoted costs" are used for quoting and "Actual Costs" ( So to speak ) are
used for costing of real jobs using real times.

Having 2 different cost structures is actually very handy.

Why would you want Vantage to use the "Actual Costs" for quoting ? I'm not
sure what you are driving at.

Do you have different rates in the system for quoting vs actual ?

-----Original Message-----
From: acretors@... [mailto:acretors@...]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 10:03 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Quote Module


To all,
I created a quote in Vantage 4.0.904, pulled in the MFG Details, and
looked at the worksheet. The worksheet cost didn't agree with our
average cost. A call to Epicor revealed that Vantage is using the
routing times to develop costs. I expected Vantage to use the actual
costs. Does anyone else feel this way? The same thing would apply to
the costed BOM report which doesn't use real costs either.

Perhaps there is a discipline for updating routings that we aren't
aware of. What are you guys doing to:
1. Update routings?
2. Develop cost worksheets via the quote module?

Thanks in advance!!

Andrew



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor



<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=176325.1307935.2900315.1248727/D=egroupmail/S=1700007
183:N/A=567189/R=1/*http://domains.yahoo.com>
<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=176325.1307935.2900315.1248727/D=egroupmail/S=1700007
183:N/A=567189/R=2/*http://www.domains.com>

www.


<http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=176325.1307935.2900315.1248727/D=egroupmai
l/S=1700007183:N/A=567189/rand=943064678>

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
vantage-unsubscribe@egroups.com
My understanding is this:
Where does vantage get the quoted hours from?

Here's how I see it:
You set up the routing, and this is a good estimate of how long it
will take to make something. Over time, you develop a actual cost,
based upon the actual times needed to make a part. This actual costs
(average, in our case) more closely reflects reality because it is
based upon what has actually happened.
Basically, I want to generate a worksheet of costs based upon what
has actually happened. Does that help?

Andrew

--- In vantage@y..., Todd Anderson <tanderson@j...> wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> My understanding of the quoting module is that it uses "Quoted
Cost" x
> "Quoted Hrs". As opposed to using the "Costing Rates".
>
> "Quoted costs" are used for quoting and "Actual Costs" ( So to
speak ) are
> used for costing of real jobs using real times.
>
> Having 2 different cost structures is actually very handy.
>
> Why would you want Vantage to use the "Actual Costs" for
quoting ? I'm not
> sure what you are driving at.
>
> Do you have different rates in the system for quoting vs actual ?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: acretors@c... [mailto:acretors@c...]
> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 10:03 AM
> To: vantage@y...
> Subject: [Vantage] Quote Module
>
>
> To all,
> I created a quote in Vantage 4.0.904, pulled in the MFG Details,
and
> looked at the worksheet. The worksheet cost didn't agree with our
> average cost. A call to Epicor revealed that Vantage is using the
> routing times to develop costs. I expected Vantage to use the
actual
> costs. Does anyone else feel this way? The same thing would apply
to
> the costed BOM report which doesn't use real costs either.
>
> Perhaps there is a discipline for updating routings that we aren't
> aware of. What are you guys doing to:
> 1. Update routings?
> 2. Develop cost worksheets via the quote module?
>
> Thanks in advance!!
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
>
>
>
<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=176325.1307935.2900315.1248727/D=egroupmail/S=1
700007
> 183:N/A=567189/R=1/*http://domains.yahoo.com>
>
<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=176325.1307935.2900315.1248727/D=egroupmail/S=1
700007
> 183:N/A=567189/R=2/*http://www.domains.com>
>
> www.
>
>
> <http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?
M=176325.1307935.2900315.1248727/D=egroupmai
> l/S=1700007183:N/A=567189/rand=943064678>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> vantage-unsubscribe@egroups.com
Totally.

How about generating a progress report that averages your actual run times
for the last year and then manually updating these 'Revised' run times into
the quote and re-calculating ?

I just ran some reports that compares the material issued to jobs with the
estimated material over the course of 2 years. We found some parts where
the raw material used was 10-15 % higher on average then what we expected
for a variety of reasons including bad estimates and 'Cutoffs' that weren't
factored in correctly. We are now in the process of updating the quotes for
these jobs based on the higher material usage. Of course, our customers
could be far more understanding about price increases ... especially now
when the economy is dropping like a rock ...

I would agree with you that averaging the runs for hrs and material should
be part of the overall loop.

I've been trying to get the company to put a procedure in place where if the
actual run times or material are more then +/- 10 % of estimate then the
operator fills out sheet explaining WHY when he/she finishes the run. Some
variances are in the "Stuff Happens" category - tooling breaks, bad
material, etc. But if the time is for real and it's the best the operator
can do then I'd like to see the quoting / engineering people review the job
within 24 hrs of the actual run so they can talk to the operator while it is
still fresh in his/her head as to what happened. I definitely believe the
quote should be reviewed before you sell it again. Waiting for a year to
find out that your material estimate was off by 10 % seems a little ....

-----Original Message-----
From: acretors@... [mailto:acretors@...]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 10:52 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Quote Module


My understanding is this:
Where does vantage get the quoted hours from?

Here's how I see it:
You set up the routing, and this is a good estimate of how long it
will take to make something. Over time, you develop a actual cost,
based upon the actual times needed to make a part. This actual costs
(average, in our case) more closely reflects reality because it is
based upon what has actually happened.
Basically, I want to generate a worksheet of costs based upon what
has actually happened. Does that help?

Andrew

--- In vantage@y..., Todd Anderson <tanderson@j...> wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> My understanding of the quoting module is that it uses "Quoted
Cost" x
> "Quoted Hrs". As opposed to using the "Costing Rates".
>
> "Quoted costs" are used for quoting and "Actual Costs" ( So to
speak ) are
> used for costing of real jobs using real times.
>
> Having 2 different cost structures is actually very handy.
>
> Why would you want Vantage to use the "Actual Costs" for
quoting ? I'm not
> sure what you are driving at.
>
> Do you have different rates in the system for quoting vs actual ?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: acretors@c... [mailto:acretors@c...]
> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 10:03 AM
> To: vantage@y...
> Subject: [Vantage] Quote Module
>
>
> To all,
> I created a quote in Vantage 4.0.904, pulled in the MFG Details,
and
> looked at the worksheet. The worksheet cost didn't agree with our
> average cost. A call to Epicor revealed that Vantage is using the
> routing times to develop costs. I expected Vantage to use the
actual
> costs. Does anyone else feel this way? The same thing would apply
to
> the costed BOM report which doesn't use real costs either.
>
> Perhaps there is a discipline for updating routings that we aren't
> aware of. What are you guys doing to:
> 1. Update routings?
> 2. Develop cost worksheets via the quote module?
>
> Thanks in advance!!
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
>
>
>
< http://rd.yahoo.com/M=176325.1307935.2900315.1248727/D=egroupmail/S=1
<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=176325.1307935.2900315.1248727/D=egroupmail/S=1>
700007
> 183:N/A=567189/R=1/* http://domains.yahoo.com <http://domains.yahoo.com> >
>
< http://rd.yahoo.com/M=176325.1307935.2900315.1248727/D=egroupmail/S=1
<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=176325.1307935.2900315.1248727/D=egroupmail/S=1>
700007
> 183:N/A=567189/R=2/* http://www.domains.com <http://www.domains.com> >

>
> www.
>
>
> < http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l? <http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?>
M=176325.1307935.2900315.1248727/D=egroupmai
> l/S=1700007183:N/A=567189/rand=943064678>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> vantage-unsubscribe@egroups.com



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor



<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=176325.1307935.2900315.1248727/D=egroupmail/S=1700007
183:N/A=567194/R=1/*http://domains.yahoo.com>
Do you know the name you want? Enter the domain name below and press GO!


www.

<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=176325.1307935.2900315.1248727/D=egroupmail/S=1700007
183:N/A=567194/R=2/*http://domains.yahoo.com> Yahoo! Domains

<http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=176325.1307935.2900315.1248727/D=egroupmai
l/S=1700007183:N/A=567194/rand=607360819>

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
vantage-unsubscribe@egroups.com
Andrew,

Our supervisors used to complain that the production rates (Pieces Per
Hour) we put into job travelers were unreasonable (one way or the
other). Now when the job goes to the shop floor shop supervision is
charged to address these rates. If the shop doesn't think the rates are
attainable, they go into the office and negotiate a revised rate, the
job templates are then changed on the spot. The quotes then get the
best estimate at the time.

When we do cell work, we have a scorecard board that the lead person
enters the rate per hour each hour or half hour. They also complete the
same info on a form the identifies any problems they had with the job or
suggested improvements. When these sheets are turned in a review is
made of them and the Production Detail Report. Any major differences
are then reviewed and changes made to the job templates as appropriate.

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: acretors@... [SMTP:acretors@...]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 11:03 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Quote Module

To all,
I created a quote in Vantage 4.0.904, pulled in the MFG Details,
and
looked at the worksheet. The worksheet cost didn't agree with
our
average cost. A call to Epicor revealed that Vantage is using
the
routing times to develop costs. I expected Vantage to use the
actual
costs. Does anyone else feel this way? The same thing would
apply to
the costed BOM report which doesn't use real costs either.

Perhaps there is a discipline for updating routings that we
aren't
aware of. What are you guys doing to:
1. Update routings?
2. Develop cost worksheets via the quote module?

Thanks in advance!!

Andrew


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
vantage-unsubscribe@egroups.com
Thanks for your suggestions. What I am hearing is that routings are
routinely reviewed and updated; something that is apparently not
happening here. Probably because our pre-Vantage software didn't have
routings...
I still think, however, that the power of a database should be
exploited by using the most current data, not waiting for the user to
manually update the information. By waiting for a user, it is little
more than an electronic manual system. Wouldn't it be nice if you had
a switch that, when flipped in the company configuration, told
vantage to update the routings with the averaged times of the last x
number of jobs? How much time per year could be saved by not having
negotiations with your shop floor supervisors?

Andrew



--- In vantage@y..., Steve Wirtz <SWirtz@m...> wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> Our supervisors used to complain that the production rates (Pieces
Per
> Hour) we put into job travelers were unreasonable (one way or the
> other). Now when the job goes to the shop floor shop supervision is
> charged to address these rates. If the shop doesn't think the
rates are
> attainable, they go into the office and negotiate a revised rate,
the
> job templates are then changed on the spot. The quotes then get the
> best estimate at the time.
>
> When we do cell work, we have a scorecard board that the lead person
> enters the rate per hour each hour or half hour. They also
complete the
> same info on a form the identifies any problems they had with the
job or
> suggested improvements. When these sheets are turned in a review is
> made of them and the Production Detail Report. Any major
differences
> are then reviewed and changes made to the job templates as
appropriate.
>
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: acretors@c... [SMTP:acretors@c...]
> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 11:03 AM
> To: vantage@y...
> Subject: [Vantage] Quote Module
>
> To all,
> I created a quote in Vantage 4.0.904, pulled in the MFG
Details,
> and
> looked at the worksheet. The worksheet cost didn't agree with
> our
> average cost. A call to Epicor revealed that Vantage is using
> the
> routing times to develop costs. I expected Vantage to use the
> actual
> costs. Does anyone else feel this way? The same thing would
> apply to
> the costed BOM report which doesn't use real costs either.
>
> Perhaps there is a discipline for updating routings that we
> aren't
> aware of. What are you guys doing to:
> 1. Update routings?
> 2. Develop cost worksheets via the quote module?
>
> Thanks in advance!!
>
> Andrew
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> vantage-unsubscribe@egroups.com
Andrew,

You are so right. We would love that as we talk all the time about
updating our costs for the quoting process. Our repeat jobs are usually
run about 4 times a year. We'll vote for the change if it is put up on
the wish list.

We do the less negotiating as we have gotten through most of our older
production jobs, but what that did accomplish is getting the two groups
to talk to each other which was not happening before. We have
instituted a pretty good production design review on all new jobs.



-----Original Message-----
From: acretors@... [SMTP:acretors@...]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 2:33 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Quote Module

Thanks for your suggestions. What I am hearing is that routings
are routinely reviewed and updated; something that is apparently not
happening here. Probably because our pre-Vantage software didn't have
routings...
I still think, however, that the power of a database should be
exploited by using the most current data, not waiting for the user to
manually update the information. By waiting for a user, it is little
more than an electronic manual system. Wouldn't it be nice if you had a
switch that, when flipped in the company configuration, told vantage to
update the routings with the averaged times of the last x number of
jobs? How much time per year could be saved by not having negotiations
with your shop floor supervisors?
Andrew


--- In vantage@y... <mailto:vantage@y...> , Steve Wirtz
<SWirtz@m... <mailto:SWirtz@m...> > wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> Our supervisors used to complain that the production
rates (Pieces
Per
> Hour) we put into job travelers were unreasonable (one
way or the
> other). Now when the job goes to the shop floor shop
supervision is
> charged to address these rates. If the shop doesn't
think the
rates are
> attainable, they go into the office and negotiate a
revised rate,
the
> job templates are then changed on the spot. The
quotes then get the
> best estimate at the time.
>
> When we do cell work, we have a scorecard board that
the lead person
> enters the rate per hour each hour or half hour. They
also
complete the
> same info on a form the identifies any problems they
had with the
job or
> suggested improvements. When these sheets are turned
in a review is
> made of them and the Production Detail Report. Any
major
differences
> are then reviewed and changes made to the job
templates as
appropriate.
>
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: acretors@c.. <mailto:acretors@c..> .
[SMTP:acretors@c...] <mailto:[SMTP:acretors@c...]>
> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 11:03 AM
> To: vantage@y.. <mailto:vantage@y..> .
> Subject: [Vantage] Quote Module
>
> To all,
> I created a quote in Vantage 4.0.904, pulled in
the MFG
Details,
> and
> looked at the worksheet. The worksheet cost
didn't agree with
> our
> average cost. A call to Epicor revealed that
Vantage is using
> the
> routing times to develop costs. I expected
Vantage to use the
> actual
> costs. Does anyone else feel this way? The same
thing would
> apply to
> the costed BOM report which doesn't use real
costs either.
>
> Perhaps there is a discipline for updating
routings that we
> aren't
> aware of. What are you guys doing to:
> 1. Update routings?
> 2. Develop cost worksheets via the quote module?
>
> Thanks in advance!!
>
> Andrew
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
to:
> vantage-unsubscribe@egroups.com
<mailto:vantage-unsubscribe@egroups.com>


------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
vantage-unsubscribe@egroups.com
<mailto:vantage-unsubscribe@egroups.com>
Andrew,

There is no reason that this could not be accomplished with some Progress
code run on a periodic basis.

Rick Lane
Intelligent Systems Integration, Inc.
661 B Weber Drive
Wadsworth, OH 44281
Phone: 330-335-5291

"Helping Business Make Intelligent Use of Technology"

-----Original Message-----
From: acretors@... [mailto:acretors@...]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 2:33 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Quote Module


Thanks for your suggestions. What I am hearing is that routings are
routinely reviewed and updated; something that is apparently not
happening here. Probably because our pre-Vantage software didn't have
routings...
I still think, however, that the power of a database should be
exploited by using the most current data, not waiting for the user to
manually update the information. By waiting for a user, it is little
more than an electronic manual system. Wouldn't it be nice if you had
a switch that, when flipped in the company configuration, told
vantage to update the routings with the averaged times of the last x
number of jobs? How much time per year could be saved by not having
negotiations with your shop floor supervisors?

Andrew
Then again, how much time would be spent correcting the calculations of Vantage because data collection transactions weren't done properly. This would be great, in a perfect world, where counts were always correct and nobody ever forgot to clock out. My biggest concern would be that if Vantage updates a value based on bad information...2 minutes later I can create a quote from something that is wrong. That makes the quote bad too. Then I could lose the order. I wouldn't want to start the dominos falling and then have to pick up the pieces.

I get 2 schools of thought...one that says everything should be automatic...the other that says I want to review before I update. I always say, "We're not on the starship enterprise yet where we can say...'Computer...tell me...'"



----- Original Message -----
From: acretors@...
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 3:43 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Quote Module


Thanks for your suggestions. What I am hearing is that routings are
routinely reviewed and updated; something that is apparently not
happening here. Probably because our pre-Vantage software didn't have
routings...
I still think, however, that the power of a database should be
exploited by using the most current data, not waiting for the user to
manually update the information. By waiting for a user, it is little
more than an electronic manual system. Wouldn't it be nice if you had
a switch that, when flipped in the company configuration, told
vantage to update the routings with the averaged times of the last x
number of jobs? How much time per year could be saved by not having
negotiations with your shop floor supervisors?

Andrew



--- In vantage@y..., Steve Wirtz <SWirtz@m...> wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> Our supervisors used to complain that the production rates (Pieces
Per
> Hour) we put into job travelers were unreasonable (one way or the
> other). Now when the job goes to the shop floor shop supervision is
> charged to address these rates. If the shop doesn't think the
rates are
> attainable, they go into the office and negotiate a revised rate,
the
> job templates are then changed on the spot. The quotes then get the
> best estimate at the time.
>
> When we do cell work, we have a scorecard board that the lead person
> enters the rate per hour each hour or half hour. They also
complete the
> same info on a form the identifies any problems they had with the
job or
> suggested improvements. When these sheets are turned in a review is
> made of them and the Production Detail Report. Any major
differences
> are then reviewed and changes made to the job templates as
appropriate.
>
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: acretors@c... [SMTP:acretors@c...]
> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 11:03 AM
> To: vantage@y...
> Subject: [Vantage] Quote Module
>
> To all,
> I created a quote in Vantage 4.0.904, pulled in the MFG
Details,
> and
> looked at the worksheet. The worksheet cost didn't agree with
> our
> average cost. A call to Epicor revealed that Vantage is using
> the
> routing times to develop costs. I expected Vantage to use the
> actual
> costs. Does anyone else feel this way? The same thing would
> apply to
> the costed BOM report which doesn't use real costs either.
>
> Perhaps there is a discipline for updating routings that we
> aren't
> aware of. What are you guys doing to:
> 1. Update routings?
> 2. Develop cost worksheets via the quote module?
>
> Thanks in advance!!
>
> Andrew
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> vantage-unsubscribe@egroups.com



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
vantage-unsubscribe@egroups.com<br clear=all><hr>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <a href="http://explorer.msn.com">http://explorer.msn.com</a><br></p>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Andrew:

We want the BOM and quoting to be "static" and separate from actual cost.
If something goes wrong on a particular job, the cost for that part on that
job could potentially be much higher than "normal". We do examine job
history for a part at quoting time, to make sure that our process hasn't
changed, raw material gone up and so on, since the last time we quoted or
even made the part. But that's the whole idea, to us-we want to learn from
history. Maybe we are small enough that this luxury is effective for us.

As Todd says,

"Having 2 different cost structures is actually very handy."



Lydia Coffman
Canyon Engineering Products, Inc.
I agree, Lydia.

It would be detrimental to change this to physically change the costs from
one job to the next based on actual costs. In our company to cost can vary
significantly on the basis of who worked on the job (variance in labor costs
from new hires to 20+ year employees). The only real thing to take note of
for us is the standard rate. Sometimes this needs to be adjusted if cycle
times or tooling doesn't perform as expected.

My 2 cents.

Darren Mann
Miller Products Co.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lydia Coffman [mailto:lcoffman@...]
> Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 10:58 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [Vantage] Quote Module
>
>
> Andrew:
>
> We want the BOM and quoting to be "static" and separate from
> actual cost.
> If something goes wrong on a particular job, the cost for
> that part on that
> job could potentially be much higher than "normal". We do examine job
> history for a part at quoting time, to make sure that our
> process hasn't
> changed, raw material gone up and so on, since the last time
> we quoted or
> even made the part. But that's the whole idea, to us-we
> want to learn from
> history. Maybe we are small enough that this luxury is
> effective for us.
>
> As Todd says,
>
> "Having 2 different cost structures is actually very handy."
>
>
>
> Lydia Coffman
> Canyon Engineering Products, Inc.
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ---------------------~-~>
> eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
> Click here for more details
> http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/1/_/411782/_/981738164/
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------_->
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> vantage-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
>
Is there anybody, in the group, that would fall under the
classification of "Custom Job Shop", that is using the stock
Vantage Quote Module. In particular, I'm looking to talk to someone
who uses it in it's generic form without modification. 5.0 or 5.1

Thanks,
Les
We use the quote module & are on 4.0


-----Original Message-----
From: lptingley [SMTP:ltingley@...]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 7:30 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Quote Module

Is there anybody, in the group, that would fall under the
classification of "Custom Job Shop", that is using the stock
Vantage Quote Module. In particular, I'm looking to talk to someone
who uses it in it's generic form without modification. 5.0 or 5.1

Thanks,
Les


Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/links

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
We have been using the Quote Module for over 5 years now.

What's on your mind?

Patrick Winter
sSc Specialty Screw Corporation
Vantage 5.00.317, Progress 9.1a


-----Original Message-----
From: lptingley [mailto:ltingley@...]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 7:30 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Quote Module


Is there anybody, in the group, that would fall under the
classification of "Custom Job Shop", that is using the stock
Vantage Quote Module. In particular, I'm looking to talk to someone
who uses it in it's generic form without modification. 5.0 or 5.1

Thanks,
Les


Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/links

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
We use the quote module and have just upgraded to 5.0

Kathy Hambleton
Electron Energy Corporation
717-898-2294



-----Original Message-----
From: lptingley [mailto:ltingley@...]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 8:30 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Quote Module


Is there anybody, in the group, that would fall under the
classification of "Custom Job Shop", that is using the stock
Vantage Quote Module. In particular, I'm looking to talk to someone
who uses it in it's generic form without modification. 5.0 or 5.1

Thanks,
Les


Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/links

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
I can put you in touch with our senior quote person. We are on version 4.0.

Warren R. Eddy
Information Services Manager
National Tube Form
A Leggett & Platt Company
Phone: (219) 478-2363 ext 217
Fax: (219) 478-1043
Warren.Eddy@...

-----Original Message-----
From: lptingley [mailto:ltingley@...]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 8:30 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Quote Module

Is there anybody, in the group, that would fall under the
classification of "Custom Job Shop", that is using the stock
Vantage Quote Module. In particular, I'm looking to talk to someone
who uses it in it's generic form without modification. 5.0 or 5.1

Thanks,
Les


Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/links

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Thanks for all the replies, I am looking to move away from our Custom
Estimating Program (MS Access), and go to as much "generic" Vantage as
possible.
Being a small shop, we do not have an engineering department. Our Estimators
also determine the Bill of Materials and operations. Do any of you who
answered,
use the Product Configurator as well. If not, how do you reduce the chance
of picking wrong materials or routings?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Warren Eddy [SMTP:warren.eddy@...]
> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 8:58 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [Vantage] Quote Module
>
> I can put you in touch with our senior quote person. We are on version
> 4.0.
>
> Warren R. Eddy
> Information Services Manager
> National Tube Form
> A Leggett & Platt Company
> Phone: (219) 478-2363 ext 217
> Fax: (219) 478-1043
> Warren.Eddy@...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lptingley [mailto:ltingley@...]
> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 8:30 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Vantage] Quote Module
>
> Is there anybody, in the group, that would fall under the
> classification of "Custom Job Shop", that is using the stock
> Vantage Quote Module. In particular, I'm looking to talk to someone
> who uses it in it's generic form without modification. 5.0 or 5.1
>
> Thanks,
> Les
>
>
> Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must
> have
> already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
> (1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
> Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
> (2) To search through old msg's goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
> (3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/links
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
> Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must
> have already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
> (1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
> Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
> (2) To search through old msg's goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
> (3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/links
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>