Right... Insite...
Most people put Insite on a different server. Most of the time I see it in
combination with APM, Service Connect, EPM, and other 3rd parties like that.
-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Tanya Denison
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 9:05 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: Windows Server 2012
We just found out that Insite requires 32-bit Progress. Does anyone use
Insite and 64-bit Epicor? What setup do you have to manage this?
Most people put Insite on a different server. Most of the time I see it in
combination with APM, Service Connect, EPM, and other 3rd parties like that.
-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Tanya Denison
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 9:05 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: Windows Server 2012
We just found out that Insite requires 32-bit Progress. Does anyone use
Insite and 64-bit Epicor? What setup do you have to manage this?
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Ned <TechnoBabbly@...> wrote:
> **
>
>
> No need for the extra 32-bit Admin for 64-bit. - Not needed with the
> exception of an initial installation, and only for the first initial
> conversion. Also, this doesn't need to be a dedicated server, you can
> overlay it on pretty much any server.
> Automatically limits a user to 2gb of Epicor. - Not sure I even
> understand this, there is no user limit, the only limit is the
> potential amount of RAM that can be used by a single process.
> Easier install for OpenEdge Architect (wasn't supported on 64-bit, not
> sure
> now) SQL is still 64-bit so the backups are faster. - most people
> don't use this or have a need for it.
> Have no idea of any advantage for 64-bit Epicor. Perhaps others do.
>
> Advantage, you can put more of your DB into memory, which will reduce
> the need for disk reads. You can also expand the size of your buffers
> and stack with more RAM usage available.
>
> There is no specific advantage or real reason for sticking to 32-bit
> in my opinion.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Chris Robisch
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 12:24 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: Windows Server 2012
>
> Personally, I prefer the 32-bit for the following reasons.
>
> No need for the extra 32-bit Admin for 64-bit.
> Automatically limits a user to 2gb of Epicor.
> Easier install for OpenEdge Architect (wasn't supported on 64-bit, not
> sure
> now) SQL is still 64-bit so the backups are faster.
> Have no idea of any advantage for 64-bit Epicor. Perhaps others do.
>
> With the smart caching and indexing nowadays, most of the database is
> dead history and never makes it to memory.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "snielsen28" <snielsen.hipco@...>
> To: <vantage@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 5:58 AM
> Subject: [Vantage] Re: Windows Server 2012
>
> What would be the advantage of 64-bit vs. 32-bit? Is the preferred
> path when converting to 64-bit still to convert to 32-bit and then do
> the 905 32-bit to 64-bit conversion last?
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Ned" <TechnoBabbly@...> wrote:
> >
> > Stick to Windows 2008 or 2008 R2.
> >
> > Running a newer piece of software on an older OS is easier than
> > running
> an
> > older piece of software on a newer OS.
> >
> > Your headaches will be a lot less if you do that.
> >
> > Also, you should go to the 64-bit version of 9.05 when you go live,
> > not
> the
> > 32-bit version.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On
> > Behalf
> Of
> > snielsen28
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 4:02 PM
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [Vantage] Windows Server 2012
> >
> > We plan on moving over to Epicor 9 later this year and are looking
> > at new servers. The vendors are quoting Windows Server 2012. I
> > placed a call
> with
> > Epicor and verified that Windows 2012 isn't supported with OpenEdge
> > 10.2a
> so
> > Epicor can't support it either. OpenEdge has stopped development of
> OpenEdge
> > 10.2a and there are no plans for Epicor to move to a newer version
> > of OpenEdge with the Epicor 9.05 product line. I'm rather confused
> > after searching on this group as to whether it's being used
> > successfully or
> not.
> > If you're having trouble, what are you doing or going to do? Should
> > we
> buy
> > and install the server 2008 software instead? Or is 2012 working for
> > you (after all I've been testing Epicor 9 on Windows 2003 servers
> > which
> aren't
> > supported either!)? We plan on going live on Epicor 9.05.702a (or
> > the
> most
> > current tested version available); we're 32-bit Progress. Any input
> > would
> be
> > appreciated. Thanks!
> >
> > Sue
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You
> > must
> have
> > already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
> > (1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report
> > Builder and Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
> > (2) To search through old msg's goto:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
> > (3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links
> >
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must
> have already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access.
> )
> (1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder
> and Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
> (2) To search through old msg's goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
> (3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2013.0.3345 / Virus Database: 3204/6445 - Release Date:
> 06/27/13
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must
> have already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access.
> )
> (1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder
> and Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
> (2) To search through old msg's goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
> (3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
--
*Tanya Denison* | IT Manager | NRS, Inc.
*2009 S. Main Street, Moscow, ID 83843*
*tdenison@...* <tdenison@...>* | **www.nrs.com* <http://www.nrs.com>
*c: 208.301.0599 | p: 208.883.7834 Ext 277 | f: 208.882.1744*
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links