Brian, can I ask how you use the Logicity viewer for Vantage reports
instead of Crystal? The Crystal viewer is integrated with Vantage -
I don't know if I could get my users to use an alternate if it
require extra steps.
Bill
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Brian W. Spolarich "
<bspolarich@...> wrote:
instead of Crystal? The Crystal viewer is integrated with Vantage -
I don't know if I could get my users to use an alternate if it
require extra steps.
Bill
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Brian W. Spolarich "
<bspolarich@...> wrote:
>Vantage. The
> I have had similar issues with Custom Crystal Reports in
> CR viewer in Vantage doesn't handle subreports very well, andyou'll get
> different results in the Vantage CR runtime than you will in theCrystal
> runtime.were a
>
> I gave up and use the Logicity viewer instead. I suppose if I
> better citizen I will tell Epicor but my relationship with TechSupport
> is a somewhat frustrated one.Photonix /
>
>
>
> -bws
>
>
>
> --
>
> Brian W. Spolarich ~ Manager, Information Services ~ Advanced
> PicometrixBehalf
>
> bspolarich@... ~ 734-864-5618 ~
> www.advancedphotonix.com
>
>
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On
> Of peterlv2002has
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 11:00 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Vantage] Custom Crystal Report in V8.03.407
>
>
>
> Has anyone had any issues running custom crystal reports that have
> prompts through the Vantage\crystal runtime? I have several reports
> I have written that have prompts (parameters). They ran fine until
> the must recent patch. They will work with the developer edition of
> crystal, cview (crystal's stand alone viewer), but not in Vantage.
> Epicor tells me to re write them. I did and still do not run through
> vantage. Epicor also suggested a BAQ report, but i have relationship
> issue that the BAQ tool does not seem to accommodate. I need to
> relate invchead to the salesrep table to get the reps name. But the
> repcodes in invchead are in an array which the BAQ report to tools
> not way to relate to.
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>