Epicor running on Solid State hard drives

system · August 16, 2011, 3:14pm

Thank you,

The most time consuming process for us is "Job Receipts to Inventory".
We even changed the client PC where they do the transactions, nothing
changed. It takes me a while to test it on my PC connected to a totally
different switch, so it's not the network either.

Mike Tonoyan / Natel Engr.
mtonoyan@...

-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Waffqle
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 10:54 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Epicor running on Solid State hard drives

The difference is massive. The amount of improvement will vary between
activities. That said, even our slowest processes are doubled in speed.
I'd
recommend them wholeheartedly.

However, if you haven't done so already, I'd suggest looking at your
client
performance in comparison to your server performance. If your clients
are
bogged down, improving the server will make little difference.

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Steven Gotschall
<sgotschall@...>wrote:

> **
>
>
> We switched to a new server this year that had solid state drives on a

RAID

> 10 configuration. Even with only 4 solid state drives, it made a big
> difference.
>
> From: Mike Tonoyan <mtonoyan@...>
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 12:44 PM
> Subject: [Vantage] Epicor running on Solid State hard drives
>
>
>
> I was wondering if anyone has switched from hard drives to solid state
> drives running Epicor and how it affects the performance. I downloaded
> and read "Epicor Solid State Drive hardware guide". It sounds great in
> theory but will be nice to hear from the users.
>
> Mike Tonoyan / Natel Engr.
> mtonoyan@...
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Notice: This email transmission may contain confidential information

and is

> intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, copying or disclosure

to/by

> any other person(s) is strictly prohibited. By accepting this

information,

> recipients confirm that they understand and will comply with all

applicable

> ITAR and EAR requirements.
> __________________________________________________________
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>

--
*Waffqle Driggers*
*High End Dev, System Design, Profit Drinking
*
*:: 904.962.2887*
*:: waffqle@...*
*:: NO FAXES*

*

*

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must
have already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder
and Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links

______________________________________________________________________
Notice: This email transmission may contain confidential information and is intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, copying or disclosure to/by any other person(s) is strictly prohibited. By accepting this information, recipients confirm that they understand and will comply with all applicable ITAR and EAR requirements.
______________________________________________________________________

system · August 15, 2011, 6:53pm

I figured I would throw this out here to see how you would tackle this issue.

I've got roughly 2000 Parts that need to have the same 3 or 4 materials in varying quantities added to their BOMs.

I'm thinking I have the option of either doing it by hand or developing a Service Connect workflow. Neither of those options are very appealing to me but I figured I'd ask how you would tackle the problem if assigned to you.

We're a 64-bit Progress 9.05.603 environment.

Thanks in advance,
SB

system · August 15, 2011, 7:57pm

I would use the DMT tool myself.

Mike Tonoyan / Natel Engr.

mtonoyan@...

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of sbraudrick@...
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 3:54 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Mass Add Materials to multiple BOMs

I figured I would throw this out here to see how you would tackle this
issue.

I've got roughly 2000 Parts that need to have the same 3 or 4 materials
in varying quantities added to their BOMs.

I'm thinking I have the option of either doing it by hand or developing
a Service Connect workflow. Neither of those options are very appealing
to me but I figured I'd ask how you would tackle the problem if assigned
to you.

We're a 64-bit Progress 9.05.603 environment.

Thanks in advance,
SB

______________________________________________________________________
Notice: This email transmission may contain confidential information and is intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, copying or disclosure to/by any other person(s) is strictly prohibited. By accepting this information, recipients confirm that they understand and will comply with all applicable ITAR and EAR requirements.
______________________________________________________________________

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

system · August 15, 2011, 8:00pm

DMT or service connect is probably the right answer, but you might get away with a scripting utility like autohotkey.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Tonoyan [mtonoyan@...]
Received: Monday, 15 Aug 2011, 7:57pm
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com [vantage@yahoogroups.com]
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Mass Add Materials to multiple BOMs

I would use the DMT tool myself.

Mike Tonoyan / Natel Engr.

mtonoyan@...<mailto:mtonoyan%40natelengr.com>

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf
Of sbraudrick@...<mailto:sbraudrick%40ymail.com>
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 3:54 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Vantage] Mass Add Materials to multiple BOMs

I figured I would throw this out here to see how you would tackle this
issue.

I've got roughly 2000 Parts that need to have the same 3 or 4 materials
in varying quantities added to their BOMs.

I'm thinking I have the option of either doing it by hand or developing
a Service Connect workflow. Neither of those options are very appealing
to me but I figured I'd ask how you would tackle the problem if assigned
to you.

We're a 64-bit Progress 9.05.603 environment.

Thanks in advance,
SB

__________________________________________________________
Notice: This email transmission may contain confidential information and is intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, copying or disclosure to/by any other person(s) is strictly prohibited. By accepting this information, recipients confirm that they understand and will comply with all applicable ITAR and EAR requirements.
__________________________________________________________

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

system · August 16, 2011, 12:44pm

I was wondering if anyone has switched from hard drives to solid state
drives running Epicor and how it affects the performance. I downloaded
and read "Epicor Solid State Drive hardware guide". It sounds great in
theory but will be nice to hear from the users.

Mike Tonoyan / Natel Engr.
mtonoyan@...

______________________________________________________________________
Notice: This email transmission may contain confidential information and is intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, copying or disclosure to/by any other person(s) is strictly prohibited. By accepting this information, recipients confirm that they understand and will comply with all applicable ITAR and EAR requirements.
______________________________________________________________________

system · August 16, 2011, 1:12pm

We switched to a new server this year that had solid state drives on a RAID 10 configuration.Â Even with only 4 solid state drives, it made a big difference.

From: Mike Tonoyan <mtonoyan@...>
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 12:44 PM
Subject: [Vantage] Epicor running on Solid State hard drives

Â
I was wondering if anyone has switched from hard drives to solid state
drives running Epicor and how it affects the performance. I downloaded
and read "Epicor Solid State Drive hardware guide". It sounds great in
theory but will be nice to hear from the users.

Mike Tonoyan / Natel Engr.
mtonoyan@...

__________________________________________________________
Notice: This email transmission may contain confidential information and is intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, copying or disclosure to/by any other person(s) is strictly prohibited. By accepting this information, recipients confirm that they understand and will comply with all applicable ITAR and EAR requirements.
__________________________________________________________

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

system · August 16, 2011, 1:54pm

The difference is massive. The amount of improvement will vary between
activities. That said, even our slowest processes are doubled in speed. I'd
recommend them wholeheartedly.

However, if you haven't done so already, I'd suggest looking at your client
performance in comparison to your server performance. If your clients are
bogged down, improving the server will make little difference.

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Steven Gotschall <sgotschall@...>wrote:

> **
>
>
> We switched to a new server this year that had solid state drives on a RAID
> 10 configuration. Even with only 4 solid state drives, it made a big
> difference.
>
> From: Mike Tonoyan <mtonoyan@...>
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 12:44 PM
> Subject: [Vantage] Epicor running on Solid State hard drives
>
>
>
> I was wondering if anyone has switched from hard drives to solid state
> drives running Epicor and how it affects the performance. I downloaded
> and read "Epicor Solid State Drive hardware guide". It sounds great in
> theory but will be nice to hear from the users.
>
> Mike Tonoyan / Natel Engr.
> mtonoyan@...
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Notice: This email transmission may contain confidential information and is
> intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, copying or disclosure to/by
> any other person(s) is strictly prohibited. By accepting this information,
> recipients confirm that they understand and will comply with all applicable
> ITAR and EAR requirements.
> __________________________________________________________
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>

--
*Waffqle Driggers*
*High End Dev, System Design, Profit Drinking
*
*:: 904.962.2887*
*:: waffqle@...*
*:: NO FAXES*

*

*

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

system · August 16, 2011, 2:02pm

Are you running 2 physical servers? We are wondering if the performance
increase is on the app server or the sql server.

On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 13:53:55 -0400
Waffqle <waffqle@...> wrote:
The difference is massive. The amount of improvement will
vary between
activities. That said, even our slowest processes are
doubled in speed. I'd
recommend them wholeheartedly.

However, if you haven't done so already, I'd suggest
looking at your client
performance in comparison to your server performance. If
your clients are
bogged down, improving the server will make little
difference.

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Steven Gotschall
<sgotschall@...>wrote:

> **
>
>
> We switched to a new server this year that had solid
>state drives on a RAID
> 10 configuration. Even with only 4 solid state drives,
>it made a big
> difference.
>
> From: Mike Tonoyan <mtonoyan@...>
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 12:44 PM
> Subject: [Vantage] Epicor running on Solid State hard
>drives
>
>
>
> I was wondering if anyone has switched from hard drives
>to solid state
> drives running Epicor and how it affects the performance.
>I downloaded
> and read "Epicor Solid State Drive hardware guide". It
>sounds great in
> theory but will be nice to hear from the users.
>
> Mike Tonoyan / Natel Engr.
> mtonoyan@...
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Notice: This email transmission may contain confidential
>information and is
> intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, copying
>or disclosure to/by
> any other person(s) is strictly prohibited. By accepting
>this information,
> recipients confirm that they understand and will comply
>with all applicable
> ITAR and EAR requirements.
> __________________________________________________________
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>

--
*Waffqle Driggers*
*High End Dev, System Design, Profit Drinking
*
*:: 904.962.2887*
*:: waffqle@...*
*:: NO FAXES*

*

*

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: (
Note: You must have already linked your email address to
a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for
Report Builder and Crystal Reports and other 'goodies',
please goto: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.

(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage
services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups
Links

system · August 16, 2011, 2:07pm

We run all of your Epicor stuff on 1 VM. But we're only supporting about 50
users.

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Nick <nick@...> wrote:

> **
>
>
> Are you running 2 physical servers? We are wondering if the performance
> increase is on the app server or the sql server.
>
>
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 13:53:55 -0400
> Waffqle <waffqle@...> wrote:
> The difference is massive. The amount of improvement will
> vary between
> activities. That said, even our slowest processes are
> doubled in speed. I'd
> recommend them wholeheartedly.
>
> However, if you haven't done so already, I'd suggest
> looking at your client
> performance in comparison to your server performance. If
> your clients are
> bogged down, improving the server will make little
> difference.
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Steven Gotschall
> <sgotschall@...>wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > We switched to a new server this year that had solid
> >state drives on a RAID
> > 10 configuration. Even with only 4 solid state drives,
> >it made a big
> > difference.
> >
> > From: Mike Tonoyan <mtonoyan@...>
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 12:44 PM
> > Subject: [Vantage] Epicor running on Solid State hard
> >drives
> >
> >
> >
> > I was wondering if anyone has switched from hard drives
> >to solid state
> > drives running Epicor and how it affects the performance.
> >I downloaded
> > and read "Epicor Solid State Drive hardware guide". It
> >sounds great in
> > theory but will be nice to hear from the users.
> >
> > Mike Tonoyan / Natel Engr.
> > mtonoyan@...
> >
> > __________________________________________________________
> > Notice: This email transmission may contain confidential
> >information and is
> > intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, copying
> >or disclosure to/by
> > any other person(s) is strictly prohibited. By accepting
> >this information,
> > recipients confirm that they understand and will comply
> >with all applicable
> > ITAR and EAR requirements.
> > __________________________________________________________
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> *Waffqle Driggers*
>
> *High End Dev, System Design, Profit Drinking
> *
> *:: 904.962.2887*
> *:: waffqle@...*
> *:: NO FAXES*
>
> *
>
>
> *
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> ------------------------------------
>
>
> Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: (
> Note: You must have already linked your email address to
> a yahoo id to enable access. )
> (1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for
> Report Builder and Crystal Reports and other 'goodies',
> please goto: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
>
> (2) To search through old msg's goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
> (3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage
> services goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups
> Links
>
>
>

--
*Waffqle Driggers*
*High End Dev, System Design, Profit Drinking
*
*:: 904.962.2887*
*:: waffqle@...*
*:: NO FAXES*

*

*

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

system · August 16, 2011, 2:12pm

Good Day Waffgle and Steven:

What size are your db? SQL or Informix?

Were you using a Disk array before, or just drives in the
server?

Version?

len.hartka@...

-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Waffqle
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 1:54 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Epicor running on Solid State hard drives

The difference is massive. The amount of improvement will vary between
activities. That said, even our slowest processes are doubled in speed.
I'd recommend them wholeheartedly.

However, if you haven't done so already, I'd suggest looking at your
client performance in comparison to your server performance. If your
clients are bogged down, improving the server will make little
difference.

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Steven Gotschall
<sgotschall@...>wrote:

> **
>
>
> We switched to a new server this year that had solid state drives on a

> RAID 10 configuration. Even with only 4 solid state drives, it made a

> big difference.
>
> From: Mike Tonoyan <mtonoyan@...>
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 12:44 PM
> Subject: [Vantage] Epicor running on Solid State hard drives
>
>
>
> I was wondering if anyone has switched from hard drives to solid state

> drives running Epicor and how it affects the performance. I downloaded

> and read "Epicor Solid State Drive hardware guide". It sounds great in

> theory but will be nice to hear from the users.
>
> Mike Tonoyan / Natel Engr.
> mtonoyan@...
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Notice: This email transmission may contain confidential information
> and is intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, copying or
> disclosure to/by any other person(s) is strictly prohibited. By
> accepting this information, recipients confirm that they understand
> and will comply with all applicable ITAR and EAR requirements.
> __________________________________________________________
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>

--
*Waffqle Driggers*
*High End Dev, System Design, Profit Drinking
*
*:: 904.962.2887*
*:: waffqle@...*
*:: NO FAXES*

*

*

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must
have already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder
and Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links

This e-mail and any attachments may contain proprietary and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or at 410-472-2900 and then delete the message without using, disseminating, or copying this message or any portion thereof. With e-mail communications you are urged to protect against viruses.

system · August 16, 2011, 2:22pm

~13gb Progress Database
Previously running an 8-disk RAID 10 using direct attached storage.
Currently running the same setup, except 4 SSDs instead of 8 disks.

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Len Hartka <len.hartka@...>wrote:

> **
>
>
> Good Day Waffgle and Steven:
>
> What size are your db? SQL or Informix?
>
> Were you using a Disk array before, or just drives in the
> server?
>
> Version?
>
>
> len.hartka@...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of Waffqle
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 1:54 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Vantage] Epicor running on Solid State hard drives
>
>
> The difference is massive. The amount of improvement will vary between
> activities. That said, even our slowest processes are doubled in speed.
> I'd recommend them wholeheartedly.
>
> However, if you haven't done so already, I'd suggest looking at your
> client performance in comparison to your server performance. If your
> clients are bogged down, improving the server will make little
> difference.
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Steven Gotschall
> <sgotschall@...>wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > We switched to a new server this year that had solid state drives on a
>
> > RAID 10 configuration. Even with only 4 solid state drives, it made a
>
> > big difference.
> >
> > From: Mike Tonoyan <mtonoyan@...>
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 12:44 PM
> > Subject: [Vantage] Epicor running on Solid State hard drives
> >
> >
> >
> > I was wondering if anyone has switched from hard drives to solid state
>
> > drives running Epicor and how it affects the performance. I downloaded
>
> > and read "Epicor Solid State Drive hardware guide". It sounds great in
>
> > theory but will be nice to hear from the users.
> >
> > Mike Tonoyan / Natel Engr.
> > mtonoyan@...
> >
> > __________________________________________________________
> > Notice: This email transmission may contain confidential information
> > and is intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, copying or
> > disclosure to/by any other person(s) is strictly prohibited. By
> > accepting this information, recipients confirm that they understand
> > and will comply with all applicable ITAR and EAR requirements.
> > __________________________________________________________
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> *Waffqle Driggers*
>
> *High End Dev, System Design, Profit Drinking
> *
> *:: 904.962.2887*
> *:: waffqle@...*
> *:: NO FAXES*
>
> *
>
>
> *
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> ------------------------------------
>
>
> Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must
> have already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
> (1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder
> and Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
> (2) To search through old msg's goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
> (3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain proprietary and/or confidential
> information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
> immediately by reply e-mail or at 410-472-2900 and then delete the message
> without using, disseminating, or copying this message or any portion
> thereof. With e-mail communications you are urged to protect against
> viruses.
>
>
>

--
*Waffqle Driggers*
*High End Dev, System Design, Profit Drinking
*
*:: 904.962.2887*
*:: waffqle@...*
*:: NO FAXES*

*

*

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

system · August 16, 2011, 2:22pm

Version 9.04

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Waffqle <waffqle@...> wrote:

> ~13gb Progress Database
> Previously running an 8-disk RAID 10 using direct attached storage.
> Currently running the same setup, except 4 SSDs instead of 8 disks.
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Len Hartka <len.hartka@...>wrote:
>
>> **
>>
>>
>> Good Day Waffgle and Steven:
>>
>> What size are your db? SQL or Informix?
>>
>> Were you using a Disk array before, or just drives in the
>> server?
>>
>> Version?
>>
>>
>> len.hartka@...
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
>> Of Waffqle
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 1:54 PM
>> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
>> Subject: Re: [Vantage] Epicor running on Solid State hard drives
>>
>>
>> The difference is massive. The amount of improvement will vary between
>> activities. That said, even our slowest processes are doubled in speed.
>> I'd recommend them wholeheartedly.
>>
>> However, if you haven't done so already, I'd suggest looking at your
>> client performance in comparison to your server performance. If your
>> clients are bogged down, improving the server will make little
>> difference.
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Steven Gotschall
>> <sgotschall@...>wrote:
>>
>> > **
>> >
>> >
>> > We switched to a new server this year that had solid state drives on a
>>
>> > RAID 10 configuration. Even with only 4 solid state drives, it made a
>>
>> > big difference.
>> >
>> > From: Mike Tonoyan <mtonoyan@...>
>> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
>> > Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 12:44 PM
>> > Subject: [Vantage] Epicor running on Solid State hard drives
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I was wondering if anyone has switched from hard drives to solid state
>>
>> > drives running Epicor and how it affects the performance. I downloaded
>>
>> > and read "Epicor Solid State Drive hardware guide". It sounds great in
>>
>> > theory but will be nice to hear from the users.
>> >
>> > Mike Tonoyan / Natel Engr.
>> > mtonoyan@...
>> >
>> > __________________________________________________________
>> > Notice: This email transmission may contain confidential information
>> > and is intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, copying or
>> > disclosure to/by any other person(s) is strictly prohibited. By
>> > accepting this information, recipients confirm that they understand
>> > and will comply with all applicable ITAR and EAR requirements.
>> > __________________________________________________________
>> >
>> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> *Waffqle Driggers*
>>
>> *High End Dev, System Design, Profit Drinking
>> *
>> *:: 904.962.2887*
>> *:: waffqle@...*
>> *:: NO FAXES*
>>
>> *
>>
>>
>> *
>>
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must
>> have already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
>> (1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder
>> and Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
>> (2) To search through old msg's goto:
>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
>> (3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links
>>
>> This e-mail and any attachments may contain proprietary and/or
>> confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please
>> notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or at 410-472-2900 and then
>> delete the message without using, disseminating, or copying this message or
>> any portion thereof. With e-mail communications you are urged to protect
>> against viruses.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Waffqle Driggers*
> *High End Dev, System Design, Profit Drinking
> *
> *:: 904.962.2887*
> *:: waffqle@...*
> *:: NO FAXES*
>
> *
>
> *
>

--
*Waffqle Driggers*
*High End Dev, System Design, Profit Drinking
*
*:: 904.962.2887*
*:: waffqle@...*
*:: NO FAXES*

*

*

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

system · August 16, 2011, 2:57pm

Our database is about 4.5gb Progress.Â We were using six 15k drives on a Raid 10 before.Â Now we have two 15K drives on a raid 1 for the operating system and 4 solid state drives on a raid 10 for Vantage and the database.Â We have about 45 users.Â The new server is running Windows 2008R2 64bit Enterprise and has Two Intel Xeon X5650 @ 2.67 GHz processors.Â This gives us a total of 24 cores.Â 32GB RAM.Â So it was a big hardware upgrade for us all around.
Â
We also saw a noticeable improvement on our newer clients running Windows 7 64bit and 8GB or more RAM.

From: Len Hartka <len.hartka@...>
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 2:12 PM
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Epicor running on Solid State hard drives

Â
Good Day Waffgle and Steven:

What size are your db? SQL or Informix?

Were you using a Disk array before, or just drives in the
server?

Version?

len.hartka@...

-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Waffqle
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 1:54 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Epicor running on Solid State hard drives

The difference is massive. The amount of improvement will vary between
activities. That said, even our slowest processes are doubled in speed.
I'd recommend them wholeheartedly.

However, if you haven't done so already, I'd suggest looking at your
client performance in comparison to your server performance. If your
clients are bogged down, improving the server will make little
difference.

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Steven Gotschall
<sgotschall@...>wrote:

> **
>
>
> We switched to a new server this year that had solid state drives on a

> RAID 10 configuration. Even with only 4 solid state drives, it made a

> big difference.
>
> From: Mike Tonoyan <mtonoyan@...>
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 12:44 PM
> Subject: [Vantage] Epicor running on Solid State hard drives
>
>
>
> I was wondering if anyone has switched from hard drives to solid state

> drives running Epicor and how it affects the performance. I downloaded

> and read "Epicor Solid State Drive hardware guide". It sounds great in

> theory but will be nice to hear from the users.
>
> Mike Tonoyan / Natel Engr.
> mtonoyan@...
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Notice: This email transmission may contain confidential information
> and is intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, copying or
> disclosure to/by any other person(s) is strictly prohibited. By
> accepting this information, recipients confirm that they understand
> and will comply with all applicable ITAR and EAR requirements.
> __________________________________________________________
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>

--
*Waffqle Driggers*
*High End Dev, System Design, Profit Drinking
*
*:: 904.962.2887*
*:: waffqle@...*
*:: NO FAXES*

*

*

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

------------------------------------

Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must
have already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder
and Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links

This e-mail and any attachments may contain proprietary and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or at 410-472-2900 and then delete the message without using, disseminating, or copying this message or any portion thereof. With e-mail communications you are urged to protect against viruses.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Topic		Replies	Views
Epicor 9 Upgrade Yahoo Archive	10	686	December 15, 2009
DB Conversion Time Yahoo Archive	6	401	February 4, 2013
Server Hard drives for Epicor 9.05 Yahoo Archive	13	384	October 21, 2010
Epicor Performance Yahoo Archive	32	1713	May 16, 2012
Server Sizing for Epicor 9.05 Yahoo Archive	9	388	June 10, 2011

Epicor running on Solid State hard drives

Related Topics