BAQ Multiple Rows

Hello everyone,

Is there any way to put two rows into one line? Rather than it showing as separate rows.

Here is an example.

SC5225A Shop2OnHand has 19.00 but WrksOnHand has 0.00 I should just like to show one line with both of that information in the line. :confused:

Here is the BAQ

TEAGLE-ProductionPlanMaterials.baq (27.5 KB)

Kind regards,

If all the fields were identical the GROUP BY would limit to one row.

But your fields Shortage, Shop2OnHand and and OnHandQty differ so they’d stay as two rows

1 Like

I briefly looked at your BAQ and suspect that you have mutliple Releases per your sales order lines?
To prove this, add the OrderRel table to your top level query and display the release numbers along with the warehouse.

And/or - PART PLANT subquery looks like the root of your problem - you could try adding the Sales Order LINE to that too?

Row multiplication resulting from mixing “dimensions” is something I see users doing all the time in Epicor. I usually start out I display header, line and releases in the raw data, then decide how to aggregate from there.

Hi Bruce,

I changed the original thread, please advise on the new one.

I have resolved the CheckWeights one.

Hi Calvin
Is there anyway to put two ones into one?

Calculated field etc?

Why are the two rows different?

Why does the 2nd one of the same JonNum and MtlSeq have a different OnHandQty? (I’m assuming that’s the OHQ of part SC5225A

Indeed it is, it’s two different warehouses.

One single part as you say but pulling two different warehouse information.

Not sure I understand what you mean… if you want to pivot values from a single column on multiple rows into a multivalue field on a single row

  • if you search for “for XML Path” there are some examples on this site that might work.

Otherwise, you may need to supply more details, raw data and what the end view should look like.

Can you combine the warehouses first?

Make a subquery that has the PartPlant table, and use calc fields to sum up the warehouses
Display fields would be:

  • Company - with GROUP BY
  • PartNum - with GROUP BY
  • Calculated_OHQ - calc field of SUM(OnHandQty)

Then use that sybquery in place of the PartPlpant table in your main query

1 Like

I did think about using XML Path to produce this information. I discuss it would have to be comma split.

Combining the two QTYs wouldn’t work as the shopfloor require to know how much exactly is in each store area. :confused:


Can you upload an example of the solution you suggested I’m getting GROUP BY errors.

Kind regards,

A query that has any rows as Group By must have all non-aggregated rows as GROUP BY. Aggregated rows would be ones with functions like SUM() or COUNT() in them. I’ll see if I can whip up an example.

What happens if you just wrap your two fields in a sum and group the other fields? You have to remove the warehouse code for grouping but you have that displayed in your column.

See attached for example.

TEAGLE-ProductionPlanMaterialsEdit.baq (27.5 KB)

You will also need to remove the PartWhse.OnHandQty from this query. I didn’t do that.


@aarong - I don’t have multiple warehouses, so my example uses PartBin instead of PartPlant to get multiple records.

With a simple BAQ (single query) I get:

There are multiple rows for Mtl 10, because there are multiple PartBin records for that part. Just like you have multiple Warehouses.

Before I get too far into it, are Wrks and Shop2 the names of the warehouses?

1 Like

Yes, they’re names of warehouses.

i.e. parts may be in many bins.
Rather than digging into the specific query, here is a marked up schema screen shot - where I try to display some causes for row multiplication - and pseudo subquery for Part Bin Qtys.

Also, do you have you have access to EpicWeb/EpicCare sites?
And have already downloaded the Epicor ICE - “Tools User Guide” and “Customization User Guide”.
Can be kind of a pain to go thru and read but… they do include some good BAQ examples, will show some grouping and aggregate calculations.

@aarong - I made a subquery containg just the PartBin table, with no table criterial, and the following display fields:

One Calc field for each warehouse, with the formulas:

SUM(case when PartBin.WarehouseCode = 'mfg' THEN PartBin.OnhandQty ELSE 0 end)


SUM(case when PartBin.WarehouseCode = 'CHAL2' THEN PartBin.OnhandQty ELSE 0 end)

The difference being which warehouse (mfg or CHAL2).

Then used that in place of the PartBin table in the top query:


with display fields:


The last two “calc fields” are actually just “fields” from the subquery2. No calculation exists in Subquery1 (the top level query) for those two. The two Calc above it do use fields from JobMtl and Subquery2.


This combines all the part bins for all warehouses into a single record, with individual columns for the warehouse QOH

1 Like

Hello @ckrusen,

I am trying to follow what you are doing here but the numbers aren’t making sense to me.

In your original BAQ(Post # 15 I think), do you have more than 2 warehouses the numbers are pulling from?

If you filter your original BAQ to use only those 2 warehouses (mfg and Chal2), do you get different numbers?

I appreciate the walkthrough you did, it will be very helpful in the future.



In post 15, I was mistaken about only having one warehouse - Our production DB has just one per site, but our Test environment has multiple per site. Each row in the screenshot in post 15 was from a different warehouse. The warehouse names weren’t shown.

If i filtered my original BAQ (the one used for post 15) to just be warehouses mfg and CHAL2, then there would have only been 2 of the 6 rows shown.

Post 15 was mostly to show why one would get multiple rows.

After learning that the columns in the Original Poster’s screen shot were for specifc warehouses, I made the sub query so that it returned one row per partnum.