We were talking about EMW and other options today, actually, so I’m all for making that more user-friendly.
Edit: @jgiese.wci Out of curiosity, Do I show up as “Guest” on that site where I voted for your idea? I really do wonder how someone can be a “guest.” If so, is it because I didn’t bother to set up Gravatar?
I have to say my impression of Epicor’s responsiveness is 100% better than 2.5 years ago when we started this journey. I’ve gone from cynic to “one day I’d like to sell this stuff”
I think an idea that is needed is for ALL the Problems that have been accepted to be reviewed and put on some kind of schedule!
I bet the number of those would dwarf the list things on the ideas site. I like the ideas site so that others can review and vote but it is a little overwhelming to look at them all.
Yes - soon after we went live I noticed that it might be a good idea to monitor failed scheduled tasks on the system monitor. The problem is that blank reports are also considered a “failure”.
I make a suggestion to have a 3rd status for the system monitor so that IT could focus on the reports or jobs that truly had a problem and it was accepted. The analyst I corresponded with said this was a feature on Vantage or an older system but for some reason was not available on E10. That was 4 years ago and no response.
If I recall task agent is already in the pipeline for rebuild to make monitoring it and it’s failures far more friendly. Don’t quote me on that, but something in the back of my head tells me that.
Yes, you are right. Someone mentioned at the 2019 conference that they had to do that “read soon now”. I agree that the system monitor needs a rebuild.
There should be a way to tell MRP to relax a little… just a little.
Kind of like the Reschedule Out and In fields for PO Change Suggestions.
So here is my situation. I have 3 of part X on hand.
There is demand in the near future for 4.
I have a released job due just after the demand.
MRP sees that there is more demand than supply and that the job won’t get done in time. So it kicks out another job for the a whole production run. And based on the Receive Time on the part the MRP job won’t get done until after the job we already have released.
Now if that isn’t bad enough, that “bonus” job that MRP made is kicking out New PO Suggestions to Purchasing for the whole MOQ on the raw materials.
Our shop floor managers have to research every MRP job they see. They don’t feel like they can trust anything.
Worse, our Buyers have to research every PO Suggestion they get. They don’t feel like they can trust anything.
Is there some kind of feature we could use that would make MRP jobs look forward “X” number of days to see if we are going to be OK before it kicks out an MRP job.
All of that functionality already exists in Epicor. I would recommend getting a consultant in who knows planning inside and out to help. Changing some of the fences and other options should fix it.
I would look for an APICS consultant or something similar. The person does not need to know Epicor, just someone who really understands MRP, Planning, Scheduling, etc.